Full KONTROPERSI # 1
Sorry, this is not abuse / insult. This is little attention to our leaders. If any Presidential election controversial most of all the President of Indonesia who will win?
1. Mr. Ir. Sukarno
2. Mr. H. M. Suharto
3. Prof. Dr. Ir. BJ. Habibie
4. Mrs. Megawati Sukarno Putri
5. Mr. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
All characters have a great, their people are very respectful and charismatic. Have characteristics of each. However, there still should get the winner. His name is also the election!
We are entitled to choose and that it is not very democratic origin insult!
If I select Mr. Abdurahman Wahid, known or GUSDUR.
Why GUSDUR?
This is the reason ....
10 typical GUSDUR ....
1. He is very relaxed and nyentrik.
2. He open to public
3. Style nyeleneh
4. Thoughts also nyeleneh
5. A short word and full controversy
6. Like jokes
7. Gitu aja kok repot! Being a typical language
8. Unadorned speech without the burden / seems spontaneity.
9. Dare to speak in the forum
10. Continue to be the talk until now.
Is there any can do, if not also angry because this is a very subjective voting or through the questionnaire. Just might be spelled forever.
For those who choose the other definitely have an apology.
Remember, this is not a campaign ... This is only a glimpse through the info can be themselves.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
CLAIM YOUR SMILE
It is not a pay- again!
The living apes!
Servant duty to serve, give much information for consumers who want to shop. Hospitality and courteous behavior claims to be so sure. When we want to shop or get information. In fact all people want is good served with home-like information derived.
.
Once upon a time I saw a servant who is a supermarket owner make angry because of disregard for the visitors who come real thing happens when I want to purchase a phone, he felt he eventually buy elsewhere. Servant can view why people not like where he is. Because of the experience a little less wear.
If I choose are a salesperson or the information, I will select someone who can smile!
Yes, if given the right to demand I will make a claim to the waitress because they do not smile. Maybe we need to be made mandatory regulations, if the smile will not forfeit.
Bargains and free and can be cause for the great influence of the other people smile. With the smile of friendship, we can cause, and others want to reprimand us. Tata etiquette does not really have a fixed penalty for members can reflect someone's personality.
Do not always demand of others to do anything but try to charge us to get started. But for services that sure a task and under any circumstances.
If this agreement can be used as the basic rule that no more-the servants of Jutek, serves customers in the half. So buyers will also like to shop or just ask for specific information.
I ever and not so shopping is not because they do not bring money, but a ministry and not a bad turn.
I hop this can be useful for us, especially among business and government in improving the image of the existing services.
Always make us successful!
Claim for yours smile!
The living apes!
Servant duty to serve, give much information for consumers who want to shop. Hospitality and courteous behavior claims to be so sure. When we want to shop or get information. In fact all people want is good served with home-like information derived.
.
Once upon a time I saw a servant who is a supermarket owner make angry because of disregard for the visitors who come real thing happens when I want to purchase a phone, he felt he eventually buy elsewhere. Servant can view why people not like where he is. Because of the experience a little less wear.
If I choose are a salesperson or the information, I will select someone who can smile!
Yes, if given the right to demand I will make a claim to the waitress because they do not smile. Maybe we need to be made mandatory regulations, if the smile will not forfeit.
Bargains and free and can be cause for the great influence of the other people smile. With the smile of friendship, we can cause, and others want to reprimand us. Tata etiquette does not really have a fixed penalty for members can reflect someone's personality.
Do not always demand of others to do anything but try to charge us to get started. But for services that sure a task and under any circumstances.
If this agreement can be used as the basic rule that no more-the servants of Jutek, serves customers in the half. So buyers will also like to shop or just ask for specific information.
I ever and not so shopping is not because they do not bring money, but a ministry and not a bad turn.
I hop this can be useful for us, especially among business and government in improving the image of the existing services.
Always make us successful!
Claim for yours smile!
Who Is Most Likely To Become A Target Of Crime?
Are we all likely targets for crime? You would be correct, to some extent, if you answered this question in the affirmative. There is no one person that is immune from crime, but there are segments of our society who stand a greater chance of a run in with a criminal or criminal act.
These segments would benefit most by being familiar with ways to avoid being crime's targets. Recommended is that this group [as should all] become familiar with crime through crime reports and the recommendations contained therein. Obtaining some self-defense devices and learning how to use this technology is likewise, recommended.
Well, who are the people that make up this segment of our population and why are they more vulnerable?
They are more likely to be a victim of crime for various reasons including there age, their occupation, the time of day they work and the area in which they live. This list is not inclusive and there are plenty of combinations of scenarios that would also make a person more vulnerable.
Here is a short list of examples of groups of people and their occupations that would benefit from modern personal self-defense technology:
• Senior citizens
• Night Shift Workers
• Taxi drivers
• Disabled persons
• Delivery drivers
• Babysitters
• Postal employees
• Bar maids
• Joggers
• Tourist
• Retail clerks
• Students
• Health workers
The above list is far from exhaustive and the groups named in the list should be obvious to anyone giving it some thought.
We would hope that our communities would get the word out to this segment of the population, but we know that is not always going to be the case. In actuality, we must depend less on these agencies [including the police] to give us continuing and proper protection because their plates are full and they can only do so much. Sometimes we will have to take the matter and precautions into our own hands. Now is the time to give people the necessary tools and information they need to protect themselves and their loved ones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Bill Wallmuller is active in the "war on crime". You can find out more about personal defense technology at:http://www.personal-defense-technology.com
These segments would benefit most by being familiar with ways to avoid being crime's targets. Recommended is that this group [as should all] become familiar with crime through crime reports and the recommendations contained therein. Obtaining some self-defense devices and learning how to use this technology is likewise, recommended.
Well, who are the people that make up this segment of our population and why are they more vulnerable?
They are more likely to be a victim of crime for various reasons including there age, their occupation, the time of day they work and the area in which they live. This list is not inclusive and there are plenty of combinations of scenarios that would also make a person more vulnerable.
Here is a short list of examples of groups of people and their occupations that would benefit from modern personal self-defense technology:
• Senior citizens
• Night Shift Workers
• Taxi drivers
• Disabled persons
• Delivery drivers
• Babysitters
• Postal employees
• Bar maids
• Joggers
• Tourist
• Retail clerks
• Students
• Health workers
The above list is far from exhaustive and the groups named in the list should be obvious to anyone giving it some thought.
We would hope that our communities would get the word out to this segment of the population, but we know that is not always going to be the case. In actuality, we must depend less on these agencies [including the police] to give us continuing and proper protection because their plates are full and they can only do so much. Sometimes we will have to take the matter and precautions into our own hands. Now is the time to give people the necessary tools and information they need to protect themselves and their loved ones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Bill Wallmuller is active in the "war on crime". You can find out more about personal defense technology at:http://www.personal-defense-technology.com
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Yet Another Example of eBay Ignoring Fraud on its Website
The author is a practicing attorney, who has formed a very low opinion of eBay and its subsidiary Paypal, based on the manner in which they permit fraud to occur over their web sites. Recently, I was contacted by another defrauded customer of eBay, Lois Reynolds, and she asked me to tell her story so that others might not be victimized by using eBay.
Lois wanted to outline the details of the situation in which she was defrauded on eBay and $1232.49 has been stolen from her, not to mention the emotional turmoil she is going through. She had never bid on or used eBay before until this time.
Dec 15 2005 - Lois entered a bid on a 2000 Crown Victoria on eBayMotors.com of $1186.00, item number 4596509986. This vehicle was up for bid by Payless Auto 503-777-0012 and eBay member ID reddog4359. Lois was quickly outbidded and did not bid anymore on this vehicle.
Dec 18 2005 – Lois received an email in her eBay mailbox for a second chance offer from eBay member redlittlepebble to purchase the vehicle at her bid of $1186.00 because the winning bidder could not complete the transaction. Lois also received this same email on her alternate email address at lois.reynolds@jamesriverins.com. The email advised what she needed to do to complete the transaction. Lois was told to email the seller directly at ianc1ianc@hotmail.com and that she would need to send a western union money order for her bid amount.
Dec 21 2005 – Lois emailed the seller at the email address given and requested additional info about the vehicle and asked for a payment method other than Western Union. He advised he did not have access to Paypal.com, but to go ahead and send the wire transfer as he had a $20k deposit with eBay.
Dec 21 2005 – Since Lois had never used eBay before and did not want to get ripped off, Lois went into her eBay account and sent an email to eBay’s security and resolution department and asked if this was a valid transaction and told them what was going on.
Dec 21 2005 – Lois received an email back from confirm@eBay-info-pay.com that gave further instructions to send the money transfer. Also in a separate email on this day, Lois received another email from the same address advising the transaction was protected by eBay and to go ahead with the money transfer. [Author’s note, eBay-info-pay.com is not the same as eBay.com, and this email message was probably sent by a fraudulent company.]
Dec 22 2005 – Lois sent a wire transfer via Western Union to a David Cantrell at the following address: 1105 W. 81st pl, Los Angeles, Ca. 90044-3546. Lois sent all of the payment details to the seller at Ianc1ianc@hotmail.com and sent a copy to eBay at confirm@eBay-info-pay.com.
Dec 22 2005 – Lois received an email from confirm@eBay-info-pay.com advising that the payment info had been validated and that they would contact the seller with instructions on shipping. These emails are signed, regards eBay payment department. The vehicle was due to arrive in Richmond Va on Tuesday 12/27/2005 but did not arrive.
Dec 23 2005 – Lois received an email from eBay Customer Support (mwebhelp@eBay.com) thanking me for reporting the possible fraudulent email and that they will investigate. By this time, Lois had already sent the wire transfer because the car was a Christmas gift for her son. Lois has since received several emails from eBays customer support department advising that the transaction was not an eBay transaction and that Lois was not eligible for any protection services.
Dec 28 2005 – Lois filed a IFCC report and filed a fraud report with the Federal Trade commission. Lois has also alerted Western Union’s fraud department of this situation. A police report has been filed with the Henrico County Police Department also.
In summary, Lois was deceived out of money due to her trust in eBay’s system. Lois logged into her eBay account and the email that offered the second chance offer was in her inbox. Therefore, without question, eBay opened up its internal email system to merchants who engage in fraudulent scams of unsuspecting members of the public. Lois contacted eBay before she sent the transfer and asked for help. Because of eBay’s slow response time, another company was able to send Lois a message with an official eBay logo that advised her it was a valid transaction. Lois feels that this was an inside job or someone hacked into the eBay system and took her money, because how else would the fraudulent company have known that she wrote in just at that particular time and asked for verification. [Note from the author: It is important to close out all windows when contacting a company for verification, because if the consumer uses the same window or a linked address the link may say “eBay.com Security” but the actual link may go to another bogus site such as eBay-info-pay.com.]
had responded via email advising this transaction is not covered by any protection services as it was not an eBay transaction. But everything Lois did relating to this transactions was initiated through her eBay account.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Dr. Michael A. S. Guth, Ph.D., J.D., is an attorney at law based in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. His practice focuses on enabling people to represent themselves pro se without a lawyer (and thereby save on legal fees), as well as full representation for appellate practice. One area his work has particularly emphasized is child support defense and elimination of the unconstitutional debtor prisons that now saturate our court jurisdictions across the nation. For more information, see URL http://michaelguth.com/prose.htm and http://michaelguth.com/samplepleadings.htm.mike@michaelguth.com
Lois wanted to outline the details of the situation in which she was defrauded on eBay and $1232.49 has been stolen from her, not to mention the emotional turmoil she is going through. She had never bid on or used eBay before until this time.
Dec 15 2005 - Lois entered a bid on a 2000 Crown Victoria on eBayMotors.com of $1186.00, item number 4596509986. This vehicle was up for bid by Payless Auto 503-777-0012 and eBay member ID reddog4359. Lois was quickly outbidded and did not bid anymore on this vehicle.
Dec 18 2005 – Lois received an email in her eBay mailbox for a second chance offer from eBay member redlittlepebble to purchase the vehicle at her bid of $1186.00 because the winning bidder could not complete the transaction. Lois also received this same email on her alternate email address at lois.reynolds@jamesriverins.com. The email advised what she needed to do to complete the transaction. Lois was told to email the seller directly at ianc1ianc@hotmail.com and that she would need to send a western union money order for her bid amount.
Dec 21 2005 – Lois emailed the seller at the email address given and requested additional info about the vehicle and asked for a payment method other than Western Union. He advised he did not have access to Paypal.com, but to go ahead and send the wire transfer as he had a $20k deposit with eBay.
Dec 21 2005 – Since Lois had never used eBay before and did not want to get ripped off, Lois went into her eBay account and sent an email to eBay’s security and resolution department and asked if this was a valid transaction and told them what was going on.
Dec 21 2005 – Lois received an email back from confirm@eBay-info-pay.com that gave further instructions to send the money transfer. Also in a separate email on this day, Lois received another email from the same address advising the transaction was protected by eBay and to go ahead with the money transfer. [Author’s note, eBay-info-pay.com is not the same as eBay.com, and this email message was probably sent by a fraudulent company.]
Dec 22 2005 – Lois sent a wire transfer via Western Union to a David Cantrell at the following address: 1105 W. 81st pl, Los Angeles, Ca. 90044-3546. Lois sent all of the payment details to the seller at Ianc1ianc@hotmail.com and sent a copy to eBay at confirm@eBay-info-pay.com.
Dec 22 2005 – Lois received an email from confirm@eBay-info-pay.com advising that the payment info had been validated and that they would contact the seller with instructions on shipping. These emails are signed, regards eBay payment department. The vehicle was due to arrive in Richmond Va on Tuesday 12/27/2005 but did not arrive.
Dec 23 2005 – Lois received an email from eBay Customer Support (mwebhelp@eBay.com) thanking me for reporting the possible fraudulent email and that they will investigate. By this time, Lois had already sent the wire transfer because the car was a Christmas gift for her son. Lois has since received several emails from eBays customer support department advising that the transaction was not an eBay transaction and that Lois was not eligible for any protection services.
Dec 28 2005 – Lois filed a IFCC report and filed a fraud report with the Federal Trade commission. Lois has also alerted Western Union’s fraud department of this situation. A police report has been filed with the Henrico County Police Department also.
In summary, Lois was deceived out of money due to her trust in eBay’s system. Lois logged into her eBay account and the email that offered the second chance offer was in her inbox. Therefore, without question, eBay opened up its internal email system to merchants who engage in fraudulent scams of unsuspecting members of the public. Lois contacted eBay before she sent the transfer and asked for help. Because of eBay’s slow response time, another company was able to send Lois a message with an official eBay logo that advised her it was a valid transaction. Lois feels that this was an inside job or someone hacked into the eBay system and took her money, because how else would the fraudulent company have known that she wrote in just at that particular time and asked for verification. [Note from the author: It is important to close out all windows when contacting a company for verification, because if the consumer uses the same window or a linked address the link may say “eBay.com Security” but the actual link may go to another bogus site such as eBay-info-pay.com.]
had responded via email advising this transaction is not covered by any protection services as it was not an eBay transaction. But everything Lois did relating to this transactions was initiated through her eBay account.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Dr. Michael A. S. Guth, Ph.D., J.D., is an attorney at law based in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. His practice focuses on enabling people to represent themselves pro se without a lawyer (and thereby save on legal fees), as well as full representation for appellate practice. One area his work has particularly emphasized is child support defense and elimination of the unconstitutional debtor prisons that now saturate our court jurisdictions across the nation. For more information, see URL http://michaelguth.com/prose.htm and http://michaelguth.com/samplepleadings.htm.mike@michaelguth.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
